http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/vic/VSC/2013/146.html
EVIDENCE – The hearsay rule – Alleged prior inconsistent statement – Tender of newspaper article including alleged prior inconsistent statement – Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), ss 35, 45 and 59 – Tender refused.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/act/ACTSC/2009/26.html
LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE – waiver – to refresh or revive memory out of court – cross examination – production of proof of evidence – fairness
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 34, 35, 118, 119 and 122
EVIDENCE [228] – Witnesses – Refreshing memory – Generally – Documents used to revive memory – Memory revised before swearing affidavits read in evidence – Whether production required under Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 34 – Memory revived from part of privileged document – Rest of document not relevant to witness’ testimony – Whether production of whole document should be required under s 34.
Evidence Act 1995 ss 32, 33, 34, 35, 36